<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.popoffsets.com/">http://www.popoffsets.com/</a><!-- m -->
lmao
finally.
countdown haz begun
Q7. Isn't this the rich dictating to the poor developed nations wanting to hold back the progress of developing nations?
A. Not at all. Climate change is a life-threatening world issue for everybody.
not at all = "exactly.. and then some"
imo they should just come out the closet and start recycling retards
IQ too low? off to the recycler
ps climate change lol
Q9. I agree with family planning, education and women's empowerment, but not abortion, can I specify where I donate my money?
The PopOffsets project does not direct funding towards abortion services. Good contraception reduces the number of abortions - we would like to make abortion history..
no abortions? there goes my donation.
Q12. What’s the anticipated lifespan of the project? Is there an optimum population?
The project will grow as people, organizations and politicians begin to recognize that tackling population growth is the key way of addressing CO2 reduction and environmental degradation.
Few would argue with the statement that ‘population cannot continue to increase indefinitely’. But how do we define the limit? Using a tool called Ecological Footprinting*, which provides a snapshot of human ecological impact under given circumstances, it is possible to throw some light on this question
What is a sustainable population for Earth? – less than now!
According to the latest science, our planet’s environmental footprint is now, already, over 25% greater than its total biological resources can sustainably supply.
Assuming the global biocapacity and average footprint [F1] remain stable at the 2003 level, then, to become sustainable, the world population needs to contract to a maximum of 5.1 billion. In other words, humanity is already overshooting the total for whom the earth can continue to provide, long term.
For a ‘modest’ world footprint of 3.3 global hectares per capita (an increase in the average footprint, which of course is essential if the poorest countries are to develop, and without allowances for biodiversity or change of biocapacity), the sustainable population is 3.4 billion
For a ‘modest’ world footprint of 3.3 gha/cap, plus a 12% allowance for biodiversity (but none for attrition of biocapacity), the sustainable population is 3.0 billion.
For a ‘modest’ world footprint of 3.3 gha/cap, plus a 20% margin for biodiversity and attrition of biocapacity then the sustainable population is 2.7 billion
basically the goal is to slaughter 5 billion people, cuz condoms just aint gonna cut it.
